---

name: structured-output description: |

Triggers: consistency, reporting, structured, structure, formatting Guide to formatting review deliverables for consistency, ensuring findings are comparable across different types of analysis.

Triggers: report formatting, deliverable structure, consistent output, review output, findings format, report template, output consistency

Use when: formatting final review outputs, ensuring consistent deliverable structure, making findings comparable across reviews

DO NOT use when: capturing evidence during analysis - use evidence-logging. DO NOT use when: reviewing changes - use diff-analysis or review-core first.

Consult this skill when formatting final review deliverables. category: output-patterns tags: [formatting, deliverables, consistency, reporting, structure] dependencies: [imbue:evidence-logging] tools: [] usage_patterns:

• deliverable-formatting
• report-structure
• consistent-output complexity: beginner estimated_tokens: 1000

---

Table of Contents

• When to Use
• Activation Patterns
• Required TodoWrite Items
• Step 1: Select Template (structured-output:template-selected)
• Step 2: Format Findings (structured-output:findings-formatted)
• Step 3: Assign Actions (structured-output:actions-assigned)
• Step 4: Attach Appendix (structured-output:appendix-attached)
• Output Quality Checklist
• Exit Criteria

Structured Output

When to Use

• When finalizing any review or analysis.
• To format findings in a consistent and actionable way.
• Before presenting results to stakeholders or committing them to documentation.

Activation Patterns

Trigger Keywords: format, structure, deliverable, report, organize, present, consistent Contextual Cues:

• "format this as a report" or "structure the output"
• "create a deliverable" or "present these findings"
• "organize this consistently" or "standardize the format"
• "make this actionable" or "prepare for stakeholders"

Auto-Load When: Finalizing any analysis deliverable or when consistent formatting is requested.

Required TodoWrite Items

1. structured-output:template-selected
2. structured-output:findings-formatted
3. structured-output:actions-assigned
4. structured-output:appendix-attached

Mark each item complete as you finish the corresponding step.

Step 1: Select Template (structured-output:template-selected)

• Choose output format based on deliverable type:
  • Review Report: Summary, Findings, Recommendations, Evidence.
  • PR Description: Summary, Changes, Test Plan, Notes.
  • Release Notes: Highlights, Breaking Changes, Fixes, Credits.
  • Incident Report: Timeline, Impact, Root Cause, Remediation.
• Confirm audience and required detail level.

Step 2: Format Findings (structured-output:findings-formatted)

• Use consistent finding structure:

  ### [SEVERITY] Finding Title
  **Location**: file.rs:123
  **Category**: Security | Performance | Correctness | Style
  **Description**: Brief explanation of the issue.
  **Evidence**: [E1, E2] - Reference to evidence log.
  **Recommendation**: Specific remediation steps.
  

  Verification: Run the command with --help flag to verify availability.
• Severity levels: CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW, INFO.
• Order findings by severity, then by file location.

Step 3: Assign Actions (structured-output:actions-assigned)

• Convert findings to actionable items:

  ## Action Items
  - [ ] [HIGH] Fix SQL injection in auth.py:45 (@security-team, P1)
  - [ ] [MEDIUM] Add input validation to API endpoint (@backend, P2)
  - [ ] [LOW] Update deprecated dependency (@devops, P3)
  

  Verification: Run the command with --help flag to verify availability.
• Include owner assignment where known.
• Add priority indicators (P1/P2/P3) for triage.
• Note dependencies between actions.

Step 4: Attach Appendix (structured-output:appendix-attached)

• Compile supporting materials:

  ## Appendix
  ### A. Commands Run
  [Full evidence log from imbue:evidence-logging]
  
  ### B. External References
  [Citations and documentation links]
  
  ### C. Raw Data
  [Large outputs, full diffs, or data exports]
  

  Verification: Run the command with --help flag to verify availability.
• Keep main report concise; details in appendix.
• validate appendix is navigable with clear section headers.

Output Quality Checklist

Before finalizing:

• All findings have evidence references.
• Severity levels are justified.
• Recommendations are specific and actionable.
• No orphaned sections or placeholder text.
• Format renders correctly in target medium (GitHub, Confluence, etc.).

Exit Criteria

• Todos completed with formatted deliverable.
• Output follows selected template structure.
• Stakeholders can act on findings without clarification.

Troubleshooting

Common Issues

Command not found Ensure all dependencies are installed and in PATH

Permission errors Check file permissions and run with appropriate privileges

Unexpected behavior Enable verbose logging with --verbose flag